Waltham Forest Pension Funds Divestment

Local Gov't • Waltham Forest

Waltham Forest became the first local authority in the UK to announce full divestment of its pension funds away from fossil fuels, using its pension fund instead to make green investments when suitable competitive opportunities arise.

London Borough of Waltham Forest's story

Council pension funds hold stocks worth billions of pounds in fossil fuel companies. Switching to green investments is an effective option for all local authorities.

In September 2016, the London Borough of Waltham Forest became the first local authority in the UK to announce full divestment of its pension funds away from fossil fuels – oil, gas and coal. This will reduce the funds available to companies driving these polluting industries, which increase carbon emissions and accelerate climate change.

The council surveyed divestment opportunities in 2017 and 2018, with the first transfers of money in 2018 and 2019. Total divestment is due to be completed by April 2022.

Waltham Forest remains the only council to do so. In 2021, about £10bn of investments in fossil fuels were still held by local government pension funds across the UK, even though more than 75% of councils have declared a climate emergency. Divestment is a clear way for authorities to follow through on climate promises.

Useful learnings from London Borough of Waltham Forest

Listening to local people
Declaring a climate emergency while doing nothing to divest is becoming politically untenable. Divestment has become a key focus for grassroots campaigners in recent years raising awareness amongst local residents.
By working in step with passionate local activists organising the Divest Waltham Forest campaign, the council strengthened its case for divestment, as well as its reputation and working relationship with local people.

Councillor Simon Miller, then chair of the Pension Fund Committee, championed activists and invited them to present to the committee. Waltham Forest Friends of the Earth, GoFossilFree, PlatformLondon, Greenpeace Waltham Forest and 350.org all participated in the campaign – to ignore this level of coordinated grassroots action would have been a political risk. In Waltham Forest, divestment was therefore a unanimous cross-party decision between Labour and Conservative councillors.

Financial Risk:
Market changes and future risk make divestment a financially sound decision. As the world transitions towards a low-carbon economy and fossil fuels become increasingly redundant, pension funds linked to the industry face a risk from stranded assets (something that once had value or produced income but no longer does). Other risks to funds as markets adjust include write-downs (reductions in an asset's value to offset a loss or expense) and a general fall in the value of oil, gas and coal stocks.

Pooled funds:
Most councils in the UK invest through pooled funds. Waltham Forest belongs to the London Collective Investment Vehicle, which manages the pension funds for all 32 London boroughs.

Waltham Forest Council was reliant on the vehicle having appropriate alternative options available for investment. This caused delays and complicated the goal of divestment.

Pooled funds may not have objectives that match up to an individual council's wish to divest but pooling also offers an opportunity for extended influence. Waltham Forest wants to work with the London Collective Investment Vehicle to help identify alternative investment options for all London councils.

Divestment often takes place across a 3–5-year timeframe. It may not be quick, but it is not without precedent; an earlier push on tobacco saw councils that currently have fossil fuel holdings divest and diversify their tobacco investments.

Political commitment:
Political commitment is an essential pre-requisite before embarking on divestment and councils must start as early as possible due to the slow nature of the process.

Benefits for local communities:
Divestment can serve local priorities by enabling investment to be rerouted back into local communities for the social benefit of residents. Options include investment into wind farms, solar panel cooperatives, and social housing.

Avoid distraction by 'engagement':
The divestment vs. engagement argument – ie. that it is better to engage as an 'activist investor' to push fossil fuel companies for improvements – has prompted intense debate. Vested interests and some local authorities have questioned the effectiveness of divestment, cautioning not to treat it as a cure-all.

However, local councils are simply too small an investor, even collectively, to secure significant changes from the fossil fuel industry via engagement. Councils will not convince companies to overhaul their core business model, nor is the timeline promising – with urgent action imperative, drawn out advocacy is likely to yield too little, too late.

This is illustrated by the recent decision of Dutch pension fund ABP (one of the largest pension funds in the world) which decided to divest because they felt they did not have the power to influence fossil fuel companies to make the necessary changes. ABP has much more investor power/influence than any UK local authority pension funds.

Unhelpfully, the UK government has taken the view that engagement is preferable, with divestment a final option. Teresa Clay, head of Local Government Pensions for the government, advised in September 2021 that council pension funds should resist demands from campaigners to divest from fossil fuels. Councils should forge their own path, following Waltham Forest, and make the case for divestment forcefully.

The fossil fuel industry has started to invest in some renewables or carbon reducing projects which can make it more difficult to work out what constitutes a green investment: e.g. BP has invested in a large electric vehicle charging network in England and Shell is investing in offshore wind. But both companies' fossil fuel spending still vastly dwarfs any spend on renewable initiatives. Councils seeking to divest must conduct thorough research to ensure that investments that are labelled as ethical or ESG (Environmental Social Governance) are genuine alternatives and not still going to fossil fuel producers.

London Borough of Waltham Forest's metrics

In March 2017 – the end of the financial year in which the divestment announcement was made – Waltham Forest's pension fund held £53.4m of oil, gas and coal stocks (6.6% of the fund's total value). By December 2018, the figure was £30m (3.4% of the total), a 44% reduction.

By 2021 this proportion had further dropped to 0.4%, leaving only £3.5m still to divest – huge progress in just a few years.

Waltham Forest's pioneering example has led the way and provided a blueprint. Four other local authority pension funds (Islington, Southwark, Lambeth and Cardiff) have committed to fully divest, with countless others now moving large proportions of their investments out of fossil fuels and into fossil free funds.

Waltham Forest has committed to using the pension fund to make green investments, when suitable competitive opportunities arise, in order to benefit its communities and the environment.

Feeling inspired? Discover more about this story...

Positive Impacts

Greater Fairness


Waltham Forest

Response to climate crisis





Local Gov't, 50 to 249 people

Shared by

Ashden & Friends of the Earth

Updated Feb, 2024

Recommended for you

  • Climate Friendly Bradford on Avon

    Climate Friendly Bradford on Avon

    Working in association with local organisations to become carbon neutral by 2030.

    Buildings & Places
  • Earth Cubs

    Earth Cubs

    Educating young children about climate, sustainability and the environment.

    Buildings & Places
  • Hay Community Assemblies

    Hay Community Assemblies

    Running community assemblies to make better decisions that serve the needs of all.

    Buildings & Places
  • NWG Innovation Festival
    Newcastle upon Tyne

    NWG Innovation Festival

    Finding innovative solutions to water industry challenges.

    Buildings & Places